Line Skis Sir Francis Bacon Shorty Skis 2012

Comments about Line Skis Sir Francis Bacon Shorty Skis 2012:

These skis rock. Had for a short time. Jumped up from the Afterbang shorty's to the SFBS (Sir Francis Bacon Shorty's) to help with the soft stuff. Handle great on the groomers like the Afterbangs, but showcase the agility in the powder, crud, and trees. Great "long shoes" and all day fun.

Comments about Line Skis Sir Francis Bacon Shorty Skis 2012:

A awesome big mountain ski. I ski the 155's and there really awesome. I recommend these to any kid like me who wants to shred Big Mountain.

Comments about Line Skis Sir Francis Bacon Shorty Skis 2012:

Ordered during the summer, so not yet skies, but what cool graphics. A work of art.

Great service EVO!

Comments about Line Skis Sir Francis Bacon Shorty Skis 2012:

got 'em on an end of the season deal, so unfortunately haven't used them yet. but they look super rad and i can't wait for next season... i'm a 5'3 chica, skied on line celebrity 90s for the last couple of seasons and LINEs are great. i can't imagine i won't be happy with the bacon shortys...

Comments about Line Skis Sir Francis Bacon Shorty Skis 2012:

These skis are awesome, and work perfectly for everything. I am A telemark skier, and I mostly do Big Mountain, and Park skiing. They are lightweight , so they are great for floating on the soft stuff, but also throwing down in the park. They are also super fat. The only problem I had was that they broke on the tip. I overshot A jump, and when I looked at my ski the tip was broken at the core. Other than that, these skis are great.

Comments about Line Skis Sir Francis Bacon Shorty Skis 2012:

I'm a 5'6" 135lb woman and these skis at 155 work great for me. These are my first pair of fat skis. I've used them twice so far. The first time was on icier snow on a lightly snowy day and the second was a heavyily snowing powder day. These handled way better in all conditions I skied than my older skinny skis, and I was so impressed with the way they floated over the thick powder in the untouched areas. They almost never catch on the snow and turning is practically effortless. The one sad thing I experienced with them is that they were scratched on my first trip, probably from being carried up with snowboards, but it was the only "con" I could think of. :) I'm only not giving it 5 stars because I'm no expert on skis and don't want to taint ratings.. I'm sure they're not "perfect," though I can't tell why.

Comments about Line Skis Sir Francis Bacon Shorty Skis 2012:

I. love. these. skis.

This has been a horrible year and not much powder to be had, but these skis do it all. They aren't bad on ice even which you have to deal with here in New England. I bought these skis for skiing powder and trees, and they are amazing for that - went slightly short and with the rockered tip and tail too I absolutely giggled the whole way down on my first run... floated the whole way and have never had such an easy time maneuvering. I slapped my AT bindings on them and use them for backcountry too.. they are pretty light and work just fine. The only thing I'd use my old skis for is skiing moguls at a resort. That's it. Other than that, I am in love with these skis and the graphic is awesome.

Comments about Line Skis Sir Francis Bacon Shorty Skis 2012:

Great for downhill

Deep scratches occur easily

Comments about Line Skis Sir Francis Bacon Shorty Skis 2012:

I decided to take a chance and by these skis, I have the EPPro Shorty (same specs as SFB Shorty) in 155. I have skied them in all snow conditions and have found them to be snappy and responsive. They have great float and have been easy to carve on soft groomers. I use them as my everyday East Coast ski. I would recommend them to any parent thinking about getting them for a little ripper or any "petite " women looking for a saller powder ski. I am a 5' adult female.